Käesoleval lehel on esitatud täiendavaks lugemiseks sobivad teadusartiklid teemade kaupa. Märkus [Open Access] tähistab avalikult kättesaadavaid artikleid. Märkus [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus] tähistab TLÜ arvutivõrgus ja EZproxy veebipuhvriteenuse kaudu kättesaadavaid artikleid. Mõlemal juhul töötab märkus lingina artiklile.

1. teema: Õpiobjekti mõiste ja õppematerjalide levitamise vahendid

Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version. [Open Access] (.doc)

Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4). [Open Access]

McGreal, R. (2004). Learning Objects: A Practical Definition. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (IJITDL), 9(1), 21–32. [Open Access]

McGreal, R. (2008). A Typology of Learning Object Repositories. In H.H. Adelsberger, Kinshuk, J.M. Pawlowski, & D.G. Sampson (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training (pp. 5–28). Springer. [Open Access]

Barker, P., & Campbell, L. M. (2010). Metadata for Learning Materials: An Overview of Existing Standards and Current Developments. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 7(3-4), 225-243. [Open Access]

2. teema: Õppematerjalide koostamise vahendid

Khademi, M., Haghshenas, M. & Kabir, H. (2011). A Review On Authoring Tools. In 5th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education (pp. 40-44). [Open Access]

Gonzalez-Barbone, V., & Anido-Rifon, L. (2010). From SCORM to Common Cartridge: A step forward. Computers & Education, 54(1), 88-102. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.009 [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

Leinonen, T., Purma, J., Põldoja, H., & Toikkanen, T. (2010). Information Architecture and Design Solutions Scaffolding Authoring of Open Educational Resources. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(2), 116-128. doi:10.1109/TLT.2010.2 [Open Access]

Boyle, T. (2009). Generative learning objects (GLOs): design as the basis for reuse and repurposing. In First International Conference on e-Learning and Distance Learning, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, March 16-18 2009 (pp. 1-22). [Open Access]

Ball, S., & Tenney, J. (2008). Xerte – A User-Friendly Tool for Creating Accessible Learning Objects. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler, & A. Karshmer (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 11th International Conference, ICCHP 2008, Linz, Austria, July 9-11, 2008. Proceedings (pp. 291-294). Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer. [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

3. teema: Arvutipõhine testimine

Thelwall, M. (2000). Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool. Computers & Education, 34(1), 37–49. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00037-8 [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

Arneil, S., & Holmes, M. (1999). Juggling hot potatoes: decisions and compromises in creating authoring tools for the Web. ReCALL, 11(2), 12–19. [Open Access]

AL-Smadi, M., Guetl, C., & Helic, D. (2009). Towards a standardized e-assessment system: Motivations, challenges and first findings. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4, 6–12. [Open Access] (.pdf)

Põldoja, H., Väljataga, T., Laanpere, M., & Tammets, K. (2012). Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies. World Wide Web. doi:10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2 [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

Tomberg, V., Kuli, R., Laanpere, M., & Normak, P. (2010). Delivering QTI Self-tests to Personal Learning Environments Using Wookie Widgets. In X. Luo, M. Spaniol, L. Wang, Q. Li, W. Nejdl, & W. Zhang (Eds.), Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2010 9th International Conference, Shanghai, China, December 8-10, 2010. Proceedings (pp. 250–258). Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer. [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

4. teema: Uued tehnoloogiad õppematerjalide koostamiseks

Higgins, S. (2010). The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Classroom Interaction and Learning in Primary Schools in the UK. In M. Thomas & E. C. Schmid (Eds.), Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 86–101). Hershey, Pa: IGI Global. [Open Access]

Maher, D., Phelps, R., Urane, N., & Lee, M. (2012). Primary school teachers’ use of digital resources with interactive whiteboards: The Australian context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 138–158. [Open Access] (.pdf)

McFadden, C. (2012). Are Textbooks Dead? Making Sense of the Digital Transition. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28(2), 93–99. doi:10.1007/s12109-012-9266-3 [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

Rockinson- Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers & Education, 63(0), 259–266. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022 [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011 [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

Tabuenca, B., Drachsler, H., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2012). OER in the Mobile Era: Content Repositories’ Features for Mobile Devices and Future Trends. eLearning Papers, 32. [Open Access]

5. teema: Õppematerjalide autoriõigus

Bissell, A. (2009). Permission granted: open licensing for educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 97–106. doi:10.1080/02680510802627886 [Open Access]

Keats, D. (2006). Implications of the NonCommercial (NC) Restriction for Educational Content. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 7, 74–80. [Open Access] (.pdf)

Schaffert, S., & Geser, G. (2008). Open Educational Resources and Practices. eLearning Papers, 7. [Open Access]

Wiley, D., & Gurrell, S. (2009). A decade of development…. Open Learning: the Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 11–21. doi:10.1080/02680510802627746 [Open Access]

Hilton, J., III, Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Four R’s of Openness and ALMS Analysis: Frameworks for Open Educational Resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 25(1), 37–44. doi:10.1080/02680510903482132 [Kättesaadav TLÜ arvutivõrgus]

6. teema: Õppematerjalide kvaliteet

Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2007). A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 44–59. [Open Access] (.pdf)

Sofos, A., & Kostas, A. (2009). Pedagogically-Oriented Evaluation Criteria for Educational Web Resources. eLearning Papers, 17. [Open Access]

Clements, K. I., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2011). User-oriented quality for OER: understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4–14. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x [Open Access]

Auvinen, A.-M. (2009). The challenge of quality in peer-produced eLearning content. eLearning Papers, 17. [Open Access]

Paulsson, F., & Naeve, A. (2007). Establishing Technical Quality Criteria for Learning Objects. In P. Cunningham & M. Cunningham (Eds.), Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies (pp. 1431–1439). Amsterdam: IOS Press. [Open Access]

Lisa kommentaar

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Muuda )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Muuda )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Muuda )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Muuda )

Connecting to %s